@article{ae6b8247-f261-4452-b74f-0d9c7bc83ae1,
author = {Daniel Książek},
title = {Wątpliwości interpretacyjne na gruncie art. 12 Ustawy o prawie  autorskim i prawach pokrewnych},
journal = {Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej (Studies on Labour Law and Social Policy)},
volume = {Volume 26 (2019)},
number = {Tom 26 Zeszyt 2},
year = {2019},
issn = {1429-9585},
pages = {111-120},keywords = {twórca; prawa auorskie pracownika; stosunek pracy; umowa o pracę; author employee; employee copyright; employment relationship; employment agreement; pracownik},
abstract = {Doubts concerning the interpretation in the light of Art. 12 of the Act on Copyright and Related Rights

	Works of the employee are subject to special regulation determined by the Copyright and Related Rights Act. Using strictly legal & employee terms, such as employee, employer or employment agreement within the Copyright and Related Rights Act, the legislator is obliged to maintain coherence. However, as it turns out, such term as employment agreement, understood in the labour law as one of the bases of establishment of the employment relationship, in the opinion of the representatives of the copyright doctrine is a synonym of the employment relationship. These two extreme scopes of the name ‘employment agreement’ raise serious interpretation doubts that will be analysed in this article.

	
		
			
				JEL: 
			
				 K31
		
		
			
				ASJC:
			
				  3309},
doi = {10.4467/25444654SPP.19.008.10272},
url = {https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/szppips/artykul/watpliwosci-interpretacyjne-na-gruncie-art-12-ustawy-o-prawie-autorskim-i-prawach-pokrewnych}
}