@article{9d3cf7f0-9e24-4199-acb4-0f661acb9dc2,
author = {Michael Knüppel},
title = {Zur Rekonstruktion des Proto-Nostratischen oder: wie man eine anti-omnicomparatistische Kampfschrift verfaßt},
journal = {Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia},
volume = {2015},
number = {Volume 20, Issue 4},
year = {2015},
issn = {1427-8219},
pages = {285-295},keywords = {etymology; omnicomparativism; Proto-Nostratic; reconstruction; methology},
abstract = { (On reconstruction of Proto-Nostratic, or: How to write an anti-omnicomparatistic polemic). The following article deals with A. R. Bomhard’s latest attempts to reconstruct “Proto-Nostratic” (which forms a synthesis of Nostratic proto-language as proposed by the Nostraticists of the “Moscow Nostratic school” and J. H. Greenberg’s “Eurasiatic”) in a somehow ironical way. Bomhard claims to have reconstructed the phonology as well as the vocabulary and morphology of this supposed macro-family in his bulky two-volume-work. The reviewer criticizes this especially the methodological weakness of these attempts.},
doi = {10.4467/20843836SE.15.019.2805},
url = {https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/studia-etymologica-cracoviensia/artykul/zur-rekonstruktion-des-proto-nostratischen-oder-wie-man-eine-anti-omnicomparatistische-kampfschrift-verfasst}
}