@article{9b6e4d76-964a-4668-b6b6-2e77ae8c8d0a,
author = {Andrzej Marzec},
title = {Différance Derridy. Czy błąd daje się (wy)tłumaczyć?},
journal = {Przekładaniec},
volume = {2010},
number = {Numer 24 – Myśl feministyczna a przekład},
year = {2011},
issn = {1425-6851},
pages = {263-280},keywords = {deconstruction; Derrida; différance; różnia; rórznica; spelling mistake in translation},
abstract = {Derridian différance. Is a Spelling Mistake Translatable?

	
	The article examines Polish translations of the Derridian term différance. Polish philosophical discourse uses the following renditions of différance: róż(ni(c)oś)ć by Bogdan Banasiak, różNICa by Tadeusz Sławek, gra-na-zwłokę-o-różnicę by Stanisław Cichowicz and the most popular: różnia by Joanna Skoczylas. Should a mistake be deliberately committed in Polish, as it was done in the original? Or should it be corrected, and if so – how to explain the correction? The suggestion to translate the controversial concept by means of a Polish neologism, the neographism rórznica, may be productive and such a solution may be open to a number of interpretations. Thank to its ambivalence, rórznica introduces a majority of Derridian motifs and may generate new ideas and concepts. Moreover, it allows a successful critique of logocentrism and phonocentrism of Western philosophy and a subversion of binary oppositions, hard subject and desire of self-presence. Finally, the misspelled différance may be viewed as an example of grammatical Otherness.},
doi = {10.4467/16891864PC.11.016.0215},
url = {https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/przekladaniec/artykul/differance-derridy-czy-blad-daje-sie-wy-tlumaczyc}
}