@article{7f5347b2-5c07-4cf3-9d9f-6842d9cc0846, author = {Andrzej Hejmej}, title = {(Nie)obecny głos. W podwójnym archiwum Tadeusza Różewicza}, journal = {Wielogłos}, volume = {2022}, number = {Numer 2 (52) 2022: Wokół Różewicza. O śmiechu, fotografiach i głosie}, year = {2022}, issn = {1897-1962}, pages = {89-112},keywords = {Tadeusz Różewicz; literatura; słyszenie/słuchanie; głos; skryptoralność; Tadeusz Różewicz; literature; hearing/listening; voice; scriptorality}, abstract = {(Non-)present Voice. In the Double Archive of Tadeusz Różewicz The paper focuses on the interpretation mode of the literature, which includes both textual notation as well as its voice realization, and consequently allows to reveal the phenomenon of the double literature archive (writing and voicing). This well-known problem of writing and the voice (e.g. voice in literature, acousmatic voice, voice in the text) is considered in terms of scriptorality. The author’s attention is drawn to the volume of poetry by Tadeusz Różewicz, Wiersze przeczytane [Poems Read] (Wrocław 2014), and especially to the poem “Nowe porównania” [“New comparisons”], which is discussed from the perspective of the modern auditory experience and the consequences of being in the sound in the current reality are shown. The remarks on the presence/absence of the voice (sound) in the literary reading practice, in the situation of understanding literature as a phenomenon of writing and at the same time as a phenomenon of voice, ultimately lead to an attempt of revising traditional literary studies under the conditions of the media society.}, doi = {10.4467/2084395XWI.22.006.15879}, url = {https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/wieloglos/artykul/nie-obecny-glos-w-podwojnym-archiwum-tadeusza-rozewicza} }