@article{614a8704-0581-4bb7-bd8f-7aabf98f668b,
author = {Wouter  Druwé},
title = {The Relationship between Civil and Canon Law in the Eastern Orthodox Tradition},
journal = {Krakowskie Studia z Historii  Państwa i Prawa},
volume = {Tom 8 (2015)},
number = {Tom 8, Zeszyt 4},
year = {2016},
issn = {2084-4115},
pages = {343-356},keywords = {historia prawa; prawo cywilne; prawo kanoniczne; prawo kościelne; Bizancjum; Wschodnie Cesarstwo Rzymskie; nomokanon; kanony; patriarchat Konstantynopola; Teodor Balsamon; relacje państwo–Kościół; sąd kościelny; edykt tesalonicki; kodyfikacja Justyniana; Teodozjusz Wielki; Leon VI Mądry; Bazyli I},
abstract = {Theodore Balsamon, a 12th-century Constantinopolitan canonist, famously said: “Civil law punishes, canon law heals”. This paper tries to understand that statement by studying the relationship between civil law and canon law in the Eastern Orthodox tradition. From the 4th century onwards, the Roman imperial administration gave exequaturs to episcopal judicial decisions. In his novellae, Emperor Justinian considered the canons of the ecumenical councils as nomoi, which also implied that he could change canons by enacting imperial legislation. As of the 6th century, canon and imperial laws were published together in so-called nomokanones. At the end of the 9th century, Patriarch Photios formulated – for the first and last time in Byzantine legal history – the division of competences between Emperor and Patriarch. This paper argues that, though civil and canon law were separate fields with their own specific aims, the executability of their sentences remained crucially different.},
doi = {10.4467/20844131KS.15.020.4880},
url = {https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/kshpp/artykul/the-relationship-between-civil-and-canon-law-in-the-eastern-orthodox-tradition}
}