@article{59fc9abb-5655-4780-bb64-9f588dd3e713,
author = {Dominika  Karaś, Maria  Kłym, Jan  Cieciuch },
title = {Eudajmonistyczny dobrostan psychiczny a kształtowanie poczucia tożsamości w sferze edukacyjnej i zawodowej},
journal = {Psychologia Rozwojowa},
volume = {2013},
number = {Tom 18, Numer 1},
year = {2013},
issn = {1895-6297},
pages = {87-101},keywords = {identity dimensions; identity domains; psychological well-being},
abstract = {Eudaimonic psychological well-being and identity formation in educational and occupational domains
	The main aim of the research was to empirically verify the model of relationships between the three identity dimensions: commitment, in-depth exploration and reconsideration of commitment, as differentiated in the model proposed by Crocetti, Rubini, and Meeus (2008), and the eudaimonic psychological well-being in the model proposed by Ryff (1989). The participants were 504 students and workers aged 17–55. Two separate models were created: one considered identity formation in educational domain, and the other – in occupational domain. Well-being was introduced to the model as an endogenous variable, explained by the three identity dimensions. In the model with educational identity, the identity dimensions explained 28% of well-being variance, and in the model with occupational identity – 17%. The results obtained highlighted the meaning of identity formation on the way to achieve eudaimonic well-being.},
doi = {10.4467/20843879PR.13.006.1018},
url = {https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/psychologia-rozwojowa/artykul/eudajmonistyczny-dobrostan-psychiczny-a-ksztaltowanie-poczucia-tozsamosci-w-sferze-edukacyjnej-i-zawodowej}
}