1. Postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 26 maja 2004 r., sygn. V KK 22/04, LEX nr 121992.
2. Wyrok Sądu Apelacyjnego w Lublinie z dnia 12 marca 2002 r., sygn. II AKa 39/02, LEX nr 76032.
3. Wyrok Sądu Apelacyjnego w Lublinie z 5 lipca 2017 r., sygn. II AKa 116/17, LEX nr 2355880.
4. Karczmarska D. Glosa do postanowienia SN z dnia 26 maja 2004 r., V KK 22/04, Wojskowy Przegląd Prawniczy. 2005;3:140-144.
5. Winiarska K. Efektywność holistycznej metody nauczania emisji głosu. Doctoral dissertation. Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski; 2021.
6. Gruza E. Okazanie. Problematyka kryminalistyczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Comer; 1995.
7. Kajstura M, Michałek M, Trawińska A. Ekspertyza fonoskopijna. In: Kała M, Wilk D, Wójcikiewicz J, editors. Ekspertyza sądowa. Zagadnienia wybrane. Wyd. 3. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer; 2023. p. 774-834.
8. Wójcikiewicz J. Okazanie głosu i mowy. Problemy Współczesnej Kryminalistyki. 2002;5:205-209.
9. Tomaszewski T, Rzeszotarski J. Wybrane aspekty okazania mowy. Problemy Kryminalistyki. 2010;268:5-13.
10. Juszka K. Perspektywa doskonalenia systemu wykrywalności sprawców przestępstw. Prokuratura i Prawo. 2009;7-8:219-230.
11. Lisiecki MJ. Metodyka okazania. Studium procesowokryminalistyczne. Toruń: TNOiK Dom Organizatora; 2021.
12. Home Office Circular 057/2003. Advice on the use of voice identification parades. London: Crime Reduction and Community Safety Group, Police Leadership and Powers Unit. Available from: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20130125153221/https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/advice-on-the-use-of-voice-identification-parades 
13. Robson J. A fair hearing? The use of voice identification parades in criminal investigations in England and Wales. Crim Law Rev. 2017;36(1):36-50.
14. Clifford BR. Memory for voices: the feasibility and quality of earwitness evidence. In: Lloyd-Bostock SM, Clifford BR, editors Evaluating witness evidence. Recent psychological research and new perspectives. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1983. p. 189-218.
15. Bull R, Clifford BR. Eyewitness testimony. Med Sci Law. 1999;39(2):120-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/002580249903900206 
16. Hanley JR, Smith T, Hadfield J. I recognise you but I can’t place you. An investigation of familiar-only experiences during tests of voice and face recognition. Q J Exp Psychol. 1998;51A(1):179-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713755751 
17. Damjanovic L, Hanley JR. Recalling episodic and semantic information about famous faces and voice. Mem Cogn. 2007;35:1205-1210. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193594 
18. Piątkowski K. Okazanie (studium kryminalistyczne). Szczytno: WSO; 1983.
19. Bigelow J, Poremba A. Achilles’ ear? Inferior human short-term and recognition memory in the auditory modality. PLoS One. 2014 Feb;9(2):e89914. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089914 
20. Yarmey AD, Yarmey AL, Yarmey MJ. Face and voice identification in showups and lineups. Appl Cogn Psychol. 1994 Oct;8(5):453-464. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350080504
21. Olsson N, Juslin P, Winman A. Realism of confidence in earwitness versus eyewitness identification. J Exp Psychol Appl. 1998;4(2):101-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.4.2.101
22. Kerstholt JH, Jansen NJ, Van Amelsvoort AG, Broeders AP. Earwitnesses: effects of accent, retention and telephone. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2006;20(2):187-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1175
23. Öhman L, Eriksson A, Granhag PA. Overhearing the planning of a crime: do adults outperform children as earwitnesses? J Police Crim Psychol. 2011;26(2):118-27. doi.org/10.1007/s11896-010-9076-5
24. Öhman L, Eriksson A, Granhag PA. Mobile phone quality vs. direct quality: how the presentation format affects earwitness identification accuracy. Eur J Psychol Appli to Leg Context. 2010 July;2(2):161-182.
25. Wójcikiewicz J. Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z 9 lipca 2013 r., III K 92/13. Palestra. 2014;3-4:204-208.
26. Sherrin C. Earwitness evidence: the reliability of voice identifications. Osgoode Hall Law J. 2015;52(3):819-862. https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.2957 
27. Ferenc K. Głos zza drzwi, czyli okazanie głosu po polsku. In: Moskal D, Wąsik P, editors. Ślady pamięciowe. Aspekty psychologiczne i kryminalistyczne. Kraków: Biblioteka Katedry Kryminalistyki i Bezpieczeństwa Publicznego Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego; 2013. p. 59-69.
28. Bull R, Clifford BR. Earwitness voice recognition accuracy. In: Well GF, Loftus EF, editors. Eyewitness testimony: psychological perspectives. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1984. p. 92-123.
29. Biederman-Zaręba A. Przesłuchanie osób w podeszłym wieku. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Kraków: Jagiellonian University; 2013.
30. Bull R, Rathborn H, Clifford BR. The voice-recognition accuracy of blind listeners perception. 1983;12(2):223-226. https://doi.org/10.1068/p120223 
31. Pang W, Xing H, Zhang L, Shu H, Zhang Y. Superiority of blind over sighted listeners in voice recognition. J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Aug;148(2):EL208-EL213. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0001804 
32. Olsson N, Juslin P, Winman A. Realism of confidence in earwitness versus eyewitness identification. J Exp Psychol Appl. 1998;4(2):18-118. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.4.2.101 
33. Orchard TL, Yarmey AD. The effects of whispers, voice sample duration, and voice distinctiveness on criminal speaker identification. Appl Cogn Psychol. 1995;9:249-260. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350090306 
34. Wilding J, Cook S. Sex differences and individual consistency in voice identification. Percept Mot Skills. 2000;91(2):535-538. https://doi:10.2466/pms.2000.91.2.535 
35. Roebuck R, Wilding J. Effects of vowel variety and sample length on identification of a speaker in a line-up. Appl Cogn Psychol. 1993;7(6):475-481. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350070603 
36. Thompson CP. Voice identification: speaker identifiability and a correction of the record regarding sex effects. Hum Lear J Pract Res Appl. 1985;4:19-27.
37. Skus VG, Schweinberger SR. Gender differences in familiar voice identification. Hear Res. 2013 Feb;296:131-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2012.11.004 
38. Chan AS, Ho YC, Cheung MC. Music training improves verbal memory. Nature 1986;396:128. https://doi.org/10.1038/24075 
39. Ho YC, Cheung MC, Chan AS. Music training improves verbal but not visual memory: cross-sectional and longitudinal explorations in children. Neuropsychology. 2003;17(3):439-450. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.17.3.439 
40. Bidelman GM, Gandour JT, Krishnan A. Cross-domain effects of music and language experience on the representation of pitch in the human auditory brainstem. J Cogn Neurosc. 2010;23(2):425-434. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21362
41. Deguchi C, Boureux M, Sarlo M, Besson M, Grassi M, Schön D, et al. Sentence pitch change detection in the native and unfamiliar language in musicians and non-musicians: behavioral, electro physiological and psychoacoustic study. Brain Res. 2012;1455:75-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.034 
42. Burnham D, Brooker R, Reid A. The effects of absolute pitch ability and musical training on lexical tone perception. Psychol Music. 2014 Sep 18;43(6):881-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735614546359 
43. Neves L, Correia AI, Castro SL, Martins D, Lima CF. Does music training enhance auditory and linguistic processing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of behavioral and brain evidence. Neurosc Biobehav Rev. 2022 Sep 1;140:104777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104777 
44. Moreno S, Marques C, Santos A, Santos M, Castro SL, Besson M. Musical training influences linguistic abilities in 8-year-old children: more evidence for brain plasticity. Cereb Cortex. 2008 Oct 1;19(3):712-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn120 
45. Wong PC, Perrachione TK. Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults. Appl Psycholinguist. 28 Sept 2007;28(4):565-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070312 
46. Parbery-Clark A, Strait DL , Kraus N. Context-dependent encoding in the auditory brainstem subserves enhanced speech-in-noise perception in musicians. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Oct;49(12):3338-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.08.007
47. Xie X, Myers E. The impact of musical training and tone language experience on talker identification. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jan;137(1):419-32. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4904699 
48. Broeders AP, van Amelsvoort AG. A practical approach to forensic earwitness identification: constructing a voice line-up. Problems of Forensic Sciences 2001;47:237-245.
49. Broeders AP, Rietveld AM. Speaker identification by earwitnesses. Beiträge zur Phonetik und Linguistik 1995;64:24-40.
50. Clifford BR, Denot H. visual and verbal testimony and identification under conditions of stress. Unpublished manuscript. London: North East London Polytechnic; 1982.
51. Yarmey AD, Matthys E. Voice identification of an abductor. Appl Cogn Psychol. 1992;6:367-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350060502 
52. Wójcikiewicz J. Temida nad mikroskopem. Judykatura wobec dowodu naukowego 1993-2008. Toruń: TNOiK; 2009.
53. Herbowski P, Słapczyńska D. Okazanie mowy w praktyce śledczej. Palestra. 2016;7-8:49-53.
54. Strait DL , Kraus N, Parbery-Clark A, Ashley R. Musical experience shapes top-down auditory mechanisms: Evidence from masking and auditory attention performance. Hear Res. 2010;261(1-2):22-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2009.12.021 
55. Kerstholt JH, Jansen NJ, Van Amelsvoort AG, Broeders AP. Earwitnesses: effects of speech duration, retention interval and acoustic environment. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2004;18(3):327-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.974