1687. évi IX. törvénycikk a mágnások idősb fiainak az atyai rendelkezés szerint intézendő örökösödéséről [Act IX of 1687 on the Inheritance of Senior Sons of Magnates in Accordance with the Disposition of their Father].
1723. évi L. törvénycikk az elsőszülöttségről és az 1687. évi IX. tc. magyarázatáról [Act L of 1723 on Primogeniture and the Explanation of Act IX of 1687].
1919/2013. (XII. 11.) Korm. határozat a fertődi Esterházy-kastélyegyüttes hasznosításáról [Government Decree No. 1919/2013. (11 December) on the Use of the Esterházy-castle Ensemble], Magyar Közlöny, 2013/206, 11 December 2013.
1968 Brussels Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, OJ L 299, 31.12.1972, p. 32.
1979. évi 13. törvényerejű rendelet a nemzetközi magánjogról [Decree-Law 13 of 1979 on Private International Law], Magyar Közlöny, 1979/33, 31 May 1979.
1991. évi XXV. törvény a tulajdonviszonyok rendezése érdekében, az állam által az állam- polgárok tulajdonában igazságtalanul okozott károk részleges kárpótlásáról [Act XXV of 1991 on the Partial Compensation of Damage Wrongfully Caused by the State to the Property of Citizens to Settle Ownership Relations], Magyar Közlöny, 1991/77, 11 July 1991.
2001. évi LXIV. törvény a kulturális örökség védelméről [Act LXIV of 2001 on the Protection of Cultural Heritage], Magyar Közlöny, 2001/78, 10 July 2001.
2017. évi XXVIII. törvény a nemzetközi magánjogról [Act XXVIII of 2017 on Private International Law], Magyar Közlöny, 2017/54, 11 April 2017.
Briggs A., Private International Law in English Courts, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2014.
Briggs A., The Conflict of Laws, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2013.
Bundesgesetz über das Internationale Privatrecht (IPRG) vom 18. Dezember 1987 [Federal Act on Private International Law], AS 1988 1776.
Chechi A., When Private International Law Meets Cultural Heritage Law, in: A. Bonomi, G.P. Romano (eds.), Yearbook of Private International Law – 2017/2018, Vol. 19, Otto Schmidt, Cologne 2018.
Clarkson C.M.V., Hill J., The Conflict of Laws, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2011.
Codice civile [Civil Code], 16 March 1942, Gazzetta Ufficiale, 1942, Vol. 83, No. 79.
Constitutional Court of Hungary, Decision no. 10/2023 (20 June).
Council of Europe, Committee on Culture and Education, Protection of “Incidental Collections” against Dispersal, 6 May 1998, Doc. 8111.
Council Regulation (EC) No 116/2009 of 18 December 2008 on the export of cultural goods, OJ L 39, 10.2.2009, p. 1.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, OJ L 256, 07/09/1987, p. 1.
Cour de cassation, 15 April 1988, No. 85-10.262, 85-11.198.
Court of Justice of the European Communities, C-204/08, Peter Rehder v. Air Baltic Corporation, ECR, 2009, I-6073.
Court of Justice of the European Communities, Case 158/87, R. O. E. Scherrens v. M. G. Maenhout and others, ECR, 1988, 3791.
Court of Justice of the European Communities, Case 252/84, Collector Guns GmbH & Co. KG v. Hauptzollamt Koblenz, ECR, 1985, 3387.
Court of Justice of the European Communities, Case 266/85, Hassan Shenavai v. Klaus Kreischer, ECR, 1987, 239.
Court of Justice of the European Communities, Case C-386/05, Color Drack GmbH v. Lexx International Vertriebs GmbH, ECR, 2007, I-3699.
Court of Justice of the European Union, Case C-19/09, Wood Floor Solutions Andreas Domberger GmbH v. Silva Trade SA, ECR, 2010, I-2121.
Court of Justice of the European Union, Case C-64/17, Saey Home & Garden NV/SA v. Lusavouga-Máquinas e Acessórios Industriais SA, ECLI:EU:C:2018:173.
Dicey, Morris and Collins on the Conflict of Laws, Vol. 2, 15th ed., Sweet & Maxwell, London 2012.
Directive 2014/60/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012, OJ L 159, 28.5.2014, p. 1.
Droz G.A.L., Cour de cassation (Ass. plén.). – 15 avril 1988, “Revue critique de droit international privé” 1989, Vol. 78.
Esterhazy Betriebe, A fraknói kincsek restitúciója [Restitution of the Fraknó Treasures], https://esterhazy.at/hu/r%C3%B3lunk/restit%C3%BAci%C3%B3 [accessed: 01.12.2024].
European Commission, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Recast), 14 December 2010, COM(2010) 748 final.
Fincham D., How Adopting the Lex Originis Rule Can Impede the Flow of Illicit Cultural Property, “Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts” 2008, Vol. 32.
Fisch P., Art. 97, in: H. Honsell et al. (eds.), Basler Kommentar – Internationales Privatrecht, 3rd ed., Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag, Basel 2013.
Fisch P., Vorbemerkungen zu Art. 97-108, in: H. Honsell et al. (eds.), Basler Kommentar – Internationales Privatrecht, 3rd ed., Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag, Basel 2013.
Fővárosi Ítélőtábla (Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal), Judgment of 14 April 2021, 7.Pf.20.731/2020/25.
Fővárosi Ítélőtábla (Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal), Judgment of 21 September 2022, 7.Pf.20.130/2022/16.
Fővárosi Törvényszék (Budapest-Capital Regional Court), Judgment of 23 September 2020, 4.P.22.219/2020/5.
Franzina P., The Proposed New Rule of Special Jurisdiction Regarding Rights in rem in Moveable Property: A Good Option for a Reformed Brussels I Regulation, “Diritto del Commerzio Internazionale” 2011, Vol. 25.
Frigo M., Circulation des biens culturels, détermination de la loi applicable et méthodes de règlement des litiges, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden 2016.
Jakubowski A., State Succession in Cultural Property, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015.
Jayme E., Globalization in Art Law: Clash of Interests and International Tendencies, “Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law” 2021, Vol. 38.
Kegel G., Probleme des internationalen Enteignungs- und Währungsrechts, Westdeutscher Verlag, Köln–Opladen 1956.
Kodeks na meždunarodnoto častno pravo [Private International Law Code], Dʺržaven vestnik, No. 42, 17 May 2005.
Köşgeroğlu B.Ş., Performance of Characteristic Obligation in Multiple Places under Brussels I Recast Article 7(1)(b): Legal Certainty and Predictability over “a Close Connection”, “Annales de la Faculté de droit d’Istanbul” 2022, Vol. 71.
Kreuzer K., Art. 38 Anh. I, in: K. Rebmann, F.J. Säcker, R. Rixecker (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Vol. 10: Einführungsgesetz zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuche (Art. 1–38) Internationales Privatrecht, Beck, München 1998.
Kúria, Judgment of 22 February 2023, Pfv.VII.21.188/2022/8.
Kúria, Order of 19 January 2022, Pfv.II.20.909/2021/9.
Kúria, Private law decision no. 57 of the council for the uniformity of law of the Hungarian Royal Kúria, 17 June 1933.
Lege nr. 287/2009 din 17 iulie 2009 privind Codul civil [Act No. 287/2009 of 17 July 2009 on the Civil Code], Monitorul Oficial, No. 511, 24 July 2009.
Loi n° 1.448 du 28 juin 2017 relative au droit international privé [Act No. 1.448 of 28 June 2017 on Private International Law], Journal de Monaco, No. 8337, 7 July 2017.
Loi portant le Code de droit international privé [Act Establishing the Code of Private International Law], Moniteur Belge, 27 July 2004, p. 57344.
Looschelders D., Internationales Privatrecht – Art. 3-46 EGBGB, Springer, Heidelberg 2004.
Magyarország Alaptörvénye [Fundamental Law of Hungary], Magyar Közlöny, 2011/43, 25 April 2011.
Müller M.M., Cultural Heritage Protection: Legitimacy, Property, and Functionalism, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 1998, Vol. 7.
Peres Zs., A magyar „hitbizományi jog” kezdetei [The Beginnings of Hungarian “Fideicommissum Law”], doctoral thesis, University of Pécs, Pécs 2009.
Poon A., Determining the Place of Performance under Article 7(1) of the Brussels I Recast, “International & Comparative Law Quarterly” 2021, Vol. 70(3).
Princess Paley Olga v Weisz and Others [1929] 1 K.B. 718.
Regulation (EU) 2019/880 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the introduction and the import of cultural goods, OJ L 151, 7.6.2019, p. 1.
Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast), OJ L 351, 20.12.2012, p. 1.
Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession, OJ L 201, 27.7.2012, p. 107.
Reichelt G., Kulturgüterschutz und Internationales Verfahrensrecht, “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” 1989, Vol. 9.
Roodt C., Private International Law, Art and Cultural Heritage, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2015. Savigny F.C. von, System des heutigen Römischen Rechts, Vol. 8, Veit, Berlin 1849.
Siklósi I., Római magánjog [Roman Private Law], Vol. 1, Eötvös Kiadó, Budapest 2021.
Stoll H., J. von Staudingers Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz und Nebengesetzten, Einführungsgesetz zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch/IPR, Internationales Sachenrecht, Sellier/De Gruyter, Berlin 1996.
Stoll H., Sachrechtliche Fragen des Kulturgüterschutzes in Fällen mit Auslandsberührung, in: R. Dolzer, E. Jayme, R. Mußgnug (eds.), Rechtsfragen des internationalen Kulturgüterschutzes, C.F. Müller, Heidelberg 1994.
Story J., Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws, Hilliard, Gray & Company, Boston 1834.
Stroganoff-Scherbatoff v. Weldon, 420 F. Supp. 18 (S.D.N.Y. 1976).
Symeonides S.C., A Choice-of-Law Rule for Conflicts Involving Stolen Cultural Property, “Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law” 2021, Vol. 38.
Szabados T., Article 8 of the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention: Choice of Forum, in: A.F. Vrdoljak, A. Jakubowski, A. Chechi (eds.), The 1970 UNESCO and 1995 UNIDROIT Conventions on Stolen or Illegally Transferred Cultural Property, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2024.
Szabados T., In Search of the Holy Grail of the Conflict of Laws of Cultural Property: Recent Trends in European Private International Law Codifications, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 2020, Vol. 27.
Szabados T., Internationalprivatrechtliche Aspekte der Restitution von Kulturgütern, in: A. Peters, S. Hobe, E.-M. Kieninger (eds.), Koloniale Kontinuitäten im internationalen Recht, C.F. Müller, Heidelberg 2024.
Szászy I., Magyar nemzetközi magánjog – Törvénytervezet és indokolás [Hungarian Private International Law – Draft Law and Explanation], Egyetemi Nyomda, Budapest 1948.
Szászy I., Nemzetközi magánjog [Private International Law], Sylvester, Budapest 1938. UNCTAD, Expropriation, United Nations, New York–Geneva 2012.
UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, 24 June 1995, 2421 UNTS 457.
Vadász V., Verebélyi V., At the Borderline of Public and Private Law: The Restitution of Cultural Property Held in Public Collections in Hungary, “Santander Art and Culture Law Review” 2024, Vol. 2(10).
Wantuch-Thole M., Cultural Property in Cross-Border Litigation, De Gruyter, Berlin 2015. Werbewcz S. de, Tripartitum Opus Iuris Consuetudinarii, Inclyti Regni Hungariae, Vienna 1517.
Zakon o međunarodnom privatnom pravu [Private International Law Act], Službeni list Crne Gore, No. 1/2014, 6/2014, 11/2014, 14/2014 and 47/2015.