1. Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL. Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNA. Nature. 1985 Mar 7-13;314(6006):67-73. doi: 10.1038/314067a0.
2. Gill P, Jeffreys AJ, Werrett DJ. Forensic application of DNA ‘fingerprints’. Nature. 1985;318(6046):577-9. doi: 10.1038/318577a0.
3. Jeffreys AJ, Brookfield JFY, Semeonoff R. Positive identification of an immigration test-case using human DNA fingerprints. Nature. 1985;317:818-819.
4. Jobling MA. Curiosity in the genes: the DNA fingerprinting story. Investig Genet. 2013;4(1):20. doi: 10.1186/2041-2223-4-20.
5. Saiki RK, Scharf S, Faloona F, Mullis K B, Horn GT, Erlich HA, Arnheim N. Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science. 1985;230(4732):1350-4. doi: 10.1126/science.2999980.
6. Edwards A, Civitello A, Hammond HA, Caskey CT. DNA typing and genetic mapping with trimeric and tetrameric tandem repeats. Am J Hum Genet. 1991;49(4):746-56.
7. Koehler JJ, Mnookin JL, Saks MJ. The scientific reinvention of forensic science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120(41):e2301840120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301840120.
8. Sullivan K M, Mannucci A, K impton CP, Gill P. A rapid and quantitative DNA sex test: fluorescence-based PCR analysis of X-Y homologous gene amelogenin. Biotechniques. 1993;15(4):636-8, 640-1.
9. Dettlaff-Kakol A, Pawlowski R. First Polish DNA ‘manhunt’ – an application of Y-chromosome STRs. Int J Legal Med. 2002;116(5):289-91. doi: 10.1007/s00414-002- 0320-0.
10. Amankwaa AO. Forensic DNA retention: public perspective studies in the United K ingdom and around the world. Sci Justice. 2018;58(6):455-464. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2018.05.002.
11. Struyf P, De Moor S, Vandeviver C, Renard B, Vander Beken T. The effectiveness of DNA databases in relation to their purpose and content: a systematic review. Forensic Sci Int. 2019;301:371-381. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.052.
12. Machado H, Granja R, Amorim A. Ethical challenges of merging criminal identification and civil identification within the Prüm system. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2022;57:102660. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102660.
13. Santos F, Machado H, Silva S. Forensic DNA databases in European countries: is size linked to performance? Life Sci Soc Policy. 2013;9:12. doi: 10.1186/2195-7819-9-12.
14. Branicki W, Kupiec T. Ekspertyza genetyczna. In: Kała M, Wilk D, Wójcikiewicz J, Zuba D, editors. Ekspertyza sądowa. Zagadnienia wybrane. Warszawa: Wolters K luwer; 2023. p. 154.
14. Ge J, Budowle B. Forensic investigation approaches of searching relatives in DNA databases. J Forensic Sci. 2021;66(2):430-443. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14615.
16. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody MC, Baldwin J, et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001;409(6822):860-921. doi: 10.1038/35057062.
17. Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, Li PW, Mural RJ, Sutton GG, et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science. 2001;291(5507):1304-51. doi: 10.1126/science.1058040.
18. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature. 2004;431(7011):931-45. doi: 10.1038/nature03001. linked to performance? Life Sci Soc Policy. 2013;9:12. doi: 10.1186/2195-7819-9-12.
19. Slatko BE, Gardner AF, Ausubel FM. Overview of next-generation sequencing technologies. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2018;122(1):e59. doi: 10.1002/cpmb.59.
20. Krumm N, Hoffman N. Practical estimation of cloud storage costs for clinical genomic data. Pract Lab Med. 2020;21:e00168. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00168.
21. International HapMap Consortium. A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature. 2005;437(7063):1299-320. doi: 10.1038/nature04226.
22. Abecasis GR, Altshuler D, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Gibbs RA, et al. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature. 2010;467(7319):1061-73. doi: 10.1038/nature09534.
23. Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14(10):R115. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115.
24. Vidaki A, K ayser M. From forensic epigenetics to forensic epigenomics: broadening DNA investigative intelligence. Genome Biol. 2017;18(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1373-1.
25. Erlich Y, Shor T, Pe’er I, Carmi S. Identity inference of genomic data using long-range familial searches. Science. 2018;362(6415):690-694. doi: 10.1126/science.aau4832.
26. Kling D, Phillips C, K ennett D, Tillmar A. Investigative genetic genealogy: current methods, knowledge and practice. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2021;52:102474. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102474.
27. Li H, Glusman G, Hu H, Shankaracharya, Caballero J, Hubley R, et al. Relationship estimation from whole-genome sequence data. PLoS Genet. 2014 Jan 30;10(1):e1004144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004144.
28. Phillips C. The Golden State K iller investigation and the nascent field of forensic genealogy. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018;36:186-188. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.010.
29. Rogalla-Ładniak U. The overview of forensic genetic genealogy. Arch Med Sadowej K ryminol. 2022;72(4):211-222. doi:10.4467/16891716AMSIK.22.023.17623.
30. Peck M, K oeppel A, Gorden E, Bouchet J, Heaton M, Russell D, et al. Internal validation of the ForenSeq Kintelligence kit for application to forensic genetic genealogy. Forensic Genomics. 2023;2:103-114. doi.org/10.1089/forensic.2022.0014.
31. Tillmar A, Fagerholm SA, Staaf J, Sjölund P, Ansell R. Getting the conclusive lead with investigative genetic genealogy – a successful case study of a 16 year old double murder in Sweden. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2021;53:102525. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102525.
32. Zabel J. The killer inside us: law, ethics, and the forensic use of family genetics. Berkeley J Crim L. 2019; 47-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3368705.