@article{018e9e58-77c6-7315-ab70-b3b794a40937,
author = {Janusz Dziechciaruk},
title = {Interpretation of differences in a comparative analysis of handwriting},
journal = {Problems of Forensic Sciences (Z Zagadnień Nauk Sądowych)},
volume = {2023},
number = {134},
year = {2024},
issn = {1230-7483},
pages = {133-141},keywords = {Natural variation; Range of variation; Distorted writing; Accidental variations},
abstract = {According to experts’ opinion which was also confirmed by many different experiments on handwriting, most errors made by document examiners result from a misjudgment (or misinterpretation) in the significance of a difference found between the questioned and exemplar materials. The article introduces a number of ideas for improving methodology for examination of handwriting, especially how to understand one of the main principles respecting writing identification that a writer cannot ameliorate his maximum writing ability or skill without effort, practice and/or training over a period of time, or how to prepare writing standards for examination of distorted writing.},
doi = {10.4467/12307483PFS.23.008.19057},
url = {https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/problems-of-forensic-sciences/artykul/interpretation-of-differences-in-a-comparative-analysis-of-handwriting}
}