1. Ziętek, J.; Karczewski, J.; Tomecka-Suchoń, S.; Carcione, J.; Padano, G.; Denis, C. Observations and Results of GPR Modelling of Sinkholes in Upper Silesia (Poland). Acta Geodetica and Geophysica Hungarica, vol. 36(4), 2001, pp. 377–389.
2. Marcak H.; Gołębiowski, T. Analysis of GPR Trace Attributes and Spectra for LNAPL Contaminated Ground. Proceedings of the International Conference “Near Surface 2006”, EAEG Org., Helsinki, Finland, paper no. P020, 2006.
3. Marcak, H.; Gołębiowski, T.; Tomecka-Suchoń, S. Spatial-Time Analysis of Georadar Data for the Risk Assessment of Post-Mining Voids. Proceedings of the Polish Conference “Mining Workshops 2007” (Abstract in: WUG monthly – Occupational Safety and Environmental Protection in Mining), CPPGSMiE PAN Org., Ślesin, Poland, 2007, pp. 309–324 (in Polish).
4. Marcak, H.; Gołębiowski, T.; Tomecka-Suchoń, S. 3D GPR measurements for Sinkholes Detection – Case Studies from Selected Sites in Poland. Proceedings of the International Conference “Near Surface 2008”, EAEG Org., Cracow, Poland, 2008a.
5. Marcak, H.; Gołębiowski, T.; Tomecka-Suchoń, S. Geotechnical Analysis and 4D GPR Measurements for the Assessment of the Risk of Sinkholes Occuring in Polish Mining Area. Near Surface Geophysics, vol. 6, no. 4, 2008b, pp. 233–243.
6. Gołębiowski, T. Application of the GPR Method for Detection and Monitoring of Objects with Stochastical Distribution in the Geological Medium. AGH-UST Ed., Cracow, Poland, 2012, pp. 256 (in Polish).
7. Tomecka-Suchoń, S.. Estimation of sinkhole hazard by GPR 4D method for the purpose of foundation treatments on post-mining areas. Mining Review, vol. 70, no.7, 2014, pp. 56–60 (in Polish).
8. Subrahmanyam, D.; Rao, P.H. Seismic Attributes – A Review. Proceedings of 7th International Conference and Exhibition on Petroleum Geophysics, Hyderabad, India, 2008, pp. 398.
9. Annan, A.P. Ground Penetrating Radar. Workshop Notes, Sensor and Software Inc., Canada, 2001.
10. Gołębiowski, T.; Małysa, T. The Application of Non-Standard GPR Techniques for the Examination of River Dikes. Technical Transactions, vol. 115, no. 7, 2018, pp. 121––138.
11. Roberts, R.L.; Daniels, J.J. Analysis of GPR Polarization Phenomena. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 1(2), 1996, pp. 139–157.
12. Guy, E.D.; Daniels, J.J.; Radzevicius, S. Demonstration of Using Crossed Dipole GPR Antennae for Site Characterization. Geophysical Research Letters, 26(22), 1999, pp. 3421–3424.
13. Daniels, J.J.; Wielopolski, L.; Radzevicius, S.; Bookshar, J. 3D GPR Polarization Analysis for Imaging Complex Objects. Proceedings of the SAGEEP Int. Conference, San Antonio, USA, 2003, pp. 585–597.
14. Gołębiowski, T.; Tomecka-Suchoń, T. GPR Fractures Detection Using Changeable Antennae Orientation. Proceedings of the International Conference and Exhibition, St. Petersburg. Russia, 2012.
15. Marcak, H.; Gołębiowski, T. The Use of GPR Attributes to Map a Weak Zone in a River Dike. Exploration Geophysics, 45(2), 2014, pp. 125–133.
16. Annan, A.P. Practical Processing of GPR Data. Sensor and Software Inc., Canada, 1999.
17. Yilmaz, O. Seismic Data Processing. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, USA, 1994.
18. Kasina, Z. Seismic Processing. CPPGSMiE PAN Ed., Cracow, Poland, 1998, pp. 333 (in Polish).