@article{018e57a8-06c8-7182-8713-d6169fcc873c,
author = {Marie-Sophie  de Clippele, Bert Demarsin},
title = {Pioneering Belgium: Parliamentary Legislation on the Restitution of Colonial Collections},
journal = {Santander Art and Culture Law Review},
volume = {2022},
number = {2/2022 (8)},
year = {2022},
issn = {2391-7997},
pages = {323-340},keywords = {restitution; colonial collections; inalienability; bilateral treaties; illegitimate acquisition},
abstract = {The Bill of 3 July 2022 to recognize the alienability of goods linked to the Belgian State’s colonial past and to determine a legal framework for their restitution and return (“the Restitution Bill”) puts Belgium at the forefront of international restitutions of colonial collections. With the parliamentary approval, and therefore democratically backed adoption of the Restitution Bill, Belgium is about to write history by being the first country in the world with a legislative framework allowing for large-scale restitutions of colonial collections. The situation, however, is not all roses, as the new legislation keeps its scope quite narrow (only cultural objects from former Belgian colonies, and no archives or human remains) and excludes local communities within the State of origin from being involved in restitution proceedings. Moreover, the Bill’s initial draft had to be watered down significantly to give the Government maximum freedom in negotiating bilateral restitution agreements. The relative lack of procedural rules renders the process less transparent and more political. In sidestepping the issue, the actual restitution procedure will depend almost entirely on the terms of each of the bilateral agreements, thus giving more leeway to political squabbling.},
doi = {10.4467/2450050XSNR.22.022.17035},
url = {https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/saaclr/artykul/pioneering-belgium-parliamentary-legislation-on-the-restitution-of-colonial-collections}
}